Command: Difference between revisions
JmolterWiki (talk | contribs) (Initial Edit) |
JmolterWiki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*Green-PETG Box | *Green-PETG Box | ||
Fits 2x LightAPRS and 1x BITS with space for an additional tracking unit. Larger than the -v5 box and easier to work with due to onboard LVC/regulators for BITS-v4 and the LightAPRS boards. | Fits 2x LightAPRS and 1x BITS with space for an additional tracking unit. Larger than the -v5 box and easier to work with due to onboard LVC/regulators for BITS-v4 and the LightAPRS boards. | ||
Mechanically identical to Command-v5, simply stretched from a rectangle to a square. The payload plate threaded insert holes were slightly increased in diameter which improved their durability. Total mass increase over v5 was minimal. The primary downside of this design is that Coax still runs from the plate to the lid, which creates some difficulty in closing the box and preventing a seal from being made. | |||
== Command-v5 == | == Command-v5 == | ||
*Red-PLA Box | *Red-PLA Box | ||
Flew with 2x LightAPRS, 1x BITS, and 1x Celltracker-v2. Challenging to work with due to extreme compact size and offboard LVCs. | Flew with 2x LightAPRS, 1x BITS, and 1x Celltracker-v2. Challenging to work with due to extreme compact size and offboard LVCs. Issues with Celltracker-v2's GPS (maybe ESD fault) and the high reliability of BITS led to only flying with BITS + 2 LightAPRS boards. | ||
This box design was extensively drop tested from 10, 20 and 50ft with 500g of simulated electronics mass. While the prototype was damaged, it would have protected the electronics while remaining somewhat water resistant. | |||
== Command-v4 == | == Command-v4 == |
Revision as of 01:51, 5 March 2023
WIP Command page
- Expand on Summary
- For each version get an internal, external and external with purse image
- If possible get a single picture with all of them showing relative size (its kinda impressive how much smaller they got)
- For each system indicate:
- What tracking hardware was typically flown
- Approx capabilities, redundancy, etc
- Approx mass
- Limitations/Reasons for replacement
Payload Summary
- What do it do?
Command-v6
- Green-PETG Box
Fits 2x LightAPRS and 1x BITS with space for an additional tracking unit. Larger than the -v5 box and easier to work with due to onboard LVC/regulators for BITS-v4 and the LightAPRS boards.
Mechanically identical to Command-v5, simply stretched from a rectangle to a square. The payload plate threaded insert holes were slightly increased in diameter which improved their durability. Total mass increase over v5 was minimal. The primary downside of this design is that Coax still runs from the plate to the lid, which creates some difficulty in closing the box and preventing a seal from being made.
Command-v5
- Red-PLA Box
Flew with 2x LightAPRS, 1x BITS, and 1x Celltracker-v2. Challenging to work with due to extreme compact size and offboard LVCs. Issues with Celltracker-v2's GPS (maybe ESD fault) and the high reliability of BITS led to only flying with BITS + 2 LightAPRS boards.
This box design was extensively drop tested from 10, 20 and 50ft with 500g of simulated electronics mass. While the prototype was damaged, it would have protected the electronics while remaining somewhat water resistant.
Command-v4
- EPP Foam Cooler
Mini-Command
- Small version of v3
Lack of redundancy contributes to NS-68 loss.
Command-v3
- 3D printed Cube with 2 payload plates with 2x systems per plate. Variety of hardware flown, Typically 2x Habduinos and 1x Celltracker, flew LINK and BITS.
Modern enough should be able to document anything from here and later
Command-v2
- 3D printed triple plate box
Limited info, JPL folks might have insight
Command-v1/Early Tracking
- Before the 3d printed boxes, large DIY foam boxes using RS422/Serial APRS trackers or flying mobile radios
Limited info, but need a picture